Winkelman v. Parma City School District

550 U.S. 516 (2007)

A Chronology of Case Documents

Document Date Document Name/Description
July 15, 2004 Complaint, Winkelman.
Exhibit A to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed on July 15, 2004 in the United States District. Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Exhibit B to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed on July 15, 2004.
Exhibit C to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed on July 15, 2004.
Civil Cover Sheet for Case No. 1:04-cv-01329.
Case docket, Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 1:04-cv-01329.
Aug. 6, 2004 Answer of defendant Parma City School District Board of Education.
Aug. 23, 2004 Notice of appeal.
Aug. 24, 2004 Order - The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied Plaintiffs' request for a "stay put" order.
Defendant's memorandum in support of their motion in opposition to plaintiffs' Motion for temporary restraining order.
Sept. 22, 2004 Motion for temporary restraining order.
Feb. 7, 2005 Final brief of defendant-appellee Parma City School District.
March 2, 2005 Brief in support of plaintiff's complaint, Motion for summary judgment, Motion to supplement record.
March 17, 2005 Defendant's motion to strike/disregard plaintiffs-appellants' motion for summary judgment.
June 2, 2005 Order - Judge John M. Manos denied Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on the Administrative Record (and request for reimbursement) and granted the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on the Administrative Record. Each party to bear its own cost.
July 1, 2005 Notice of appeal.
Memorandum of Opinion by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio that Jeff and Sandee Winkelman appealed.
July 14, 2005 Transmission Form - filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, district court no. 1:04cv1329, transmitting Winkelman v. Parma City Sch. Dist. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, USCA No.05-3886.
July 25, 2005 Motion for relief from judgment.
Affadavit filed by Sandee Winkelman with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio attesting to the fact that the Administrative Record was void of a Parent Post Hearing Brief.
Exhibit A to Motion for Relief from Judgment.
Exhibit B to Motion for Relief from Judgment.
Exhibit C to Motion for Relief from Judgment.
The IHO required a post hearing brief to be filed by both parties. (tr vol 4 page 690, 691).
Aug. 5, 2005 Defendant's memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' Motion for a relief from judgment.
Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local Sch. Dist., 409 F.3d 753 (6th Cir. 2005).
Exhibit A to Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For a Relief From Judgment.
Exhibit B to Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For a Relief From Judgment.
Exhibit C to Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For a Relief From Judgment.
Aug. 8, 2005 Order - the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied Plaintiff's pro se Rule 60(b) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on the Administrative Record.
Aug. 9, 2005 Plaintiffs' response to defendant's Memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' Motion for a relief from judgment.
Exhibit B to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For a Relief From Judgment requesting that the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio allow Plaintiffs to proceed pro se until further notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Exhibit D to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum...
Exhibit E to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum...
Exhibit G to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum...
Exhibit H to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum...
Exhibit I to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Memorandum...
Sept, 20, 2005 Opinion, on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Dec. 15, 2005 Order- the United States Supreme Court issued an Order staying the Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued November 4, 2005, in case no. 05-3886, pending the timely filing and disposition by this Court of a petition for a writ of certiorari.
Jan. 27, 2006 Opinion - the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in a per curiam opinion affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio's decision to deny the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
Feb. 2, 2006 Supplemental Brief in support of petition for a Writ of Certiorari.
Feb. 21, 2001 Appeal Remark from the United States Supreme Court: The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on 2/2/06 and placed on the docket 2/6/06 as No. 05−983.
Feb. 27, 2006 A true copy of mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit: Affirming the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio as to Notice of Appeal.
March 30, 2006 Petition For a Writ of Certiorari.
April 18, 2006 Reply Brief on Behalf of Petitioners.
May 8, 2006 2nd Supp. Brief in support of petition for a Writ of Certiorari.
Nov. 1, 2006 Order - On October 27, 2006, the United States Supreme Court granted Plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari.
Dec. 15, 2006 *Brief for petitioners.
Jan. 23, 2007 *Brief for respondent.
Feb. 20, 2007 *Reply brief for the petitioners.
June 27, 2007 Opinion - The United States Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
Oct. 2, 2008 Opinion, on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Oct. 28, 2008 Mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Jan. 5, 2009 Appeal Remark from the United States Supreme Court granting the Winkelmans an extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari.
Feb. 27, 2009 United States Supreme Court docketing writ of certiorari.
May 29, 2009 Respondent Parma City School District's brief in opposition to Petitioners' petition for a writ of certiorari.
June 29, 2009 United States Supreme Court letter denying writ of certiorari.
July 8, 2009 Appeal order - the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari.